Feb 26, 2010, 11:44 PM // 23:44
|
#1
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Jan 2010
Profession: W/A
|
remove kurzick/luxon from CM
WHA WHA WHA WHA????
That's right. Remove them from CM. Make some generic points that you can transfer to kurz/lux or whatever. I give a damn if it's a faction of kurzick or luxon. It could be a faction of a "Dancing Turd1" and a faction of a "Dancing Turd2". Waiting up to 6 minutes to get some 3 minutes of fun is a no fun. If there's enough of players to divide into teams - just do so. I see enough of kurzick players to make battles for 5 years ahead but no...I have to wait for some roleplayers to log into luxon side for some competition.
So the bottom line of my speech - give faction points to players independent on what "side" they are(if their team(made up from kurzick and luxon players) win - give them lux/kurz/generic/whatever points).
I will understand if there's not enough players to make teams - that's OK, but when I have to wait 5 minutes for luxons to make a team - that's just a bullshit. OK?
OK.
|
|
|
Feb 26, 2010, 11:51 PM // 23:51
|
#2
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: May 2006
Location: middle of nowhere
Guild: Krazy Guild With Krazy People [KrZy]
Profession: R/
|
wait what?
CM?
WUT
|
|
|
Feb 26, 2010, 11:58 PM // 23:58
|
#3
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Aug 2007
Guild: Primeval Warlords[wuw]
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master Ketsu
wait what?
CM?
WUT
|
Competitive Missions, I'm guessing. As in, be able to play on the luxon side but give the faction to your kurz alliance so that battles can actually start.
Though if he's seeing them start in 6 minutes, things must be going really well in JQ/FA. I usually end up waiting 15 or more. And his snark about roleplayers was out of line. :P
|
|
|
Feb 26, 2010, 11:58 PM // 23:58
|
#4
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North of the wall
Profession: Me/
|
this would be an interesting change indeed......
I wouldn't say no to this.
|
|
|
Feb 26, 2010, 11:59 PM // 23:59
|
#5
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2009
Guild: Valiant Knight Order
Profession: Mo/
|
Agree with targen here. good idea.
Last edited by DeVerseBakker; Feb 27, 2010 at 12:00 AM // 00:00..
Reason: Didn't get the OP lmao.
|
|
|
Feb 27, 2010, 12:02 AM // 00:02
|
#6
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: May 2006
Guild: The Seraphim Knights [TSK]
Profession: E/A
|
I've previously proposed a system where FA, JQ, and AB wait times could be handily managed, and consistent with lore too.
http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Feedb...FA,_JQ,_and_AB
To sum up, allow players to exchange one type of faction to another at a small gold cost.
|
|
|
Feb 27, 2010, 02:24 AM // 02:24
|
#7
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia
Profession: Mo/
|
/signed
I don't care how its done waiting times in JQ are completely out of hand.
|
|
|
Feb 27, 2010, 02:53 AM // 02:53
|
#8
|
Administrator
|
I'd rather them actually fix the reason that one side is less played than give generic faction. /notsigned.
__________________
|
|
|
Mar 01, 2010, 01:37 AM // 01:37
|
#9
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2010
Guild: [Pink]
Profession: P/
|
this would be completely inconsistent with lore
/notsigned
|
|
|
Mar 01, 2010, 04:48 AM // 04:48
|
#10
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
|
/signed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanier
this would be completely inconsistent with lore
|
People like you are the same fun-hating misanthropes who declare the idea of account-based titles bad because of "lore."
|
|
|
Mar 01, 2010, 05:05 AM // 05:05
|
#11
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesnowda
Guild: Ouch
Profession: Rt/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty Silverblade
I'd rather them actually fix the reason that one side is less played than give generic faction. /notsigned.
|
Why is Kurzick played more? >_>
I've yet to lose a single game as Luxon, and get ~1 minute games, so I've basically been raking in free points for doing next to nothing, as the Kurzick side seems to be populated largely by idiots who seem to think running away from teammates, running alone near Luxons, and attacking Warriors are all GUD IDEA.
|
|
|
Mar 02, 2010, 04:07 AM // 04:07
|
#12
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2010
Guild: [Pink]
Profession: P/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zahr Dalsk
/signed
People like you are the same fun-hating misanthropes who declare the idea of account-based titles bad because of "lore."
|
I love account based titles. I think all titles (maybe with the exception of the sunspear/norn/lb/etc...) should be account based. Making titles account based gives the player the ability to switch characters and try different playing styles without feeling like they should be playing as their one main character.
|
|
|
Mar 04, 2010, 05:30 AM // 05:30
|
#13
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Apr 2009
Guild: FaZ
Profession: D/
|
Regardless of why the problem exists, it does, and this would help solve it. Hence, it is good.
Gameplay >>> Lore
/signed
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 AM // 07:10.
|